<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electronic Passport Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techgeneration.net/2007/10/03/electronic-passport-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techgeneration.net/2007/10/03/electronic-passport-problems/</link>
	<description>Technology, life with it, and the generation that uses it</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruquay K Calloway</title>
		<link>http://techgeneration.net/2007/10/03/electronic-passport-problems/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruquay K Calloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgeneration.net/2007/10/03/electronic-passports/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>"Use of the electronic format will provide the traveler the additional security protections inherent in chip technology."

I have read this statement a few times in the passport literature.  Could we please have a list of just what these "additional security protections" of chip technology are?  I understand there are *other* features that make chip technology attractive, but what in the hell are the inherent security protections?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Use of the electronic format will provide the traveler the additional security protections inherent in chip technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have read this statement a few times in the passport literature.  Could we please have a list of just what these &#8220;additional security protections&#8221; of chip technology are?  I understand there are *other* features that make chip technology attractive, but what in the hell are the inherent security protections?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
